Loading...

CustomPartNet LogoCustomPartNet

About CustomPartNet

    About UsSponsorshipsContact UsPrivacy Policy

Process Overviews

    Injection MoldingSand CastingMillingDie CastingGlossary

Cost Estimators

    Injection Molding EstimatorMachining EstimatorDie Casting EstimatorSand Casting Estimator... see all estimators

Widgets

    Speed and Feed CalculatorDrill Size/Tap Size ChartClamping Force CalculatorVolume/Weight Calculator... see all widgets
© 2025 CustomPartNet. All Rights Reserved.
  1. Video Library
  2. Process Comparisons
  3. 3D printing: SLA vs SLS

3D printing: SLA vs SLS

Duration: 3:52

•

Published: December 25, 2025

Additive manufacturing
3D printing
Stereolithography (SLA)
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)

SLA and SLS are both additive manufacturing processes that can create dimensionally accurate, strong, and isotropic parts. Watch this video to learn more about their similarities and differences!

Related Articles

Stereolithography (SLA)

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)

Additive Manufacturing Overview

Video Transcript

Click any segment to jump to that timestamp

0:00 - 0:05

This video highlights the differences between two popular 3D printing processes,

0:05 - 0:11

stereo lithography commonly referred to as SLA, and selective laser centering, or SLS.

0:11 - 0:19

SLA uses a UV laser or projected light source to selectively cure a liquid resin,

0:19 - 0:22

forming parts layer by layer with very high precision.

0:22 - 0:26

Desktop SLA printers typically build parts upside down,

0:26 - 0:29

pulling them out of a shallow resin vat as each layer is cured.

0:30 - 0:35

SLS works by using a laser to selectively center powdered material,

0:35 - 0:40

typically nylon, fusing particles together layer by layer to form a solid part.

0:40 - 0:45

After each layer, a fresh coat of powder is spread on top, and the process repeats.

0:46 - 0:49

SLA offers a wide variety of materials,

0:49 - 0:54

each prioritizing different properties like dimensional accuracy, optical clarity, and more.

0:54 - 0:59

Though SLS also has a variety of materials, as a relatively more industrial process,

0:59 - 1:05

SLS powders typically focus more on mechanical properties like durability, stiffness, and toughness.

1:05 - 1:09

Both processes are capable of printing elastic parts.

1:10 - 1:15

Most SLA parts require support structures to combat warping or print failure,

1:15 - 1:17

which have to be removed by hand.

1:17 - 1:20

For SLS, as parts are made in a bit of powder,

1:20 - 1:25

any unused loose powder acts as support for the next layer, so no supports are needed.

1:25 - 1:31

Part orientation can be virtually arbitrary, and parts can also stack on top of each other in the build chamber.

1:33 - 1:38

SLA generally produces better surface finish and finer details than SLS,

1:38 - 1:43

allowing smooth surfaces and minimum feature sizes around 0.1 mm.

1:44 - 1:50

SLS, which fuses powdered thermoplastics, can achieve good dimensional accuracy and strong functional parts,

1:50 - 1:54

but its surfaces are naturally rougher due to the powder particles.

1:54 - 2:01

The surface feels grainy to the touch and fine details below 0.3 mm may be difficult to reproduce.

2:02 - 2:07

Both processes create near-isotropic parts with good mechanical properties,

2:07 - 2:09

but there are differences as well.

2:09 - 2:14

In general, SLA parts are usually more brittle and may be prone to cracking,

2:14 - 2:19

especially after prolonged use, whereas SLS parts tend to be more durable and robust.

2:21 - 2:24

SLA parts need a solvent wash to remove excess resin,

2:24 - 2:29

post-curing through UV or heat to reach full strength, and manual support removal.

2:29 - 2:32

This all needs to be done with proper protection,

2:32 - 2:35

as the uncured resins are hazardous to touch.

2:35 - 2:41

SLS parts need to first cool down, as the thermal shock from early removal can lead to parts warping.

2:41 - 2:45

Then, the excess powder must be removed to reveal the produced parts.

2:45 - 2:51

Sand or bead blasting is often used to remove any remaining powder and improve surface finish,

2:51 - 2:52

though it is optional.

2:52 - 2:55

As the powder used for SLS is very fine,

2:55 - 2:59

it can be harmful to inhale and protection or containment is needed.

3:00 - 3:05

A SLA printer is usually cheaper with some desktop models available,

3:05 - 3:08

and although household SLS machines do exist now,

3:08 - 3:12

most are more expensive and orientated for industrial use.

3:12 - 3:16

In terms of operation, SLS can be slightly cheaper than SLA,

3:16 - 3:21

due to efficient material use and less consumables needed, though this may vary by use.

3:22 - 3:27

SLA excels at producing highly detailed, smooth and visually precise parts,

3:27 - 3:32

making it ideal for jewelry, dental models, figurines, and aesthetic prototypes.

3:32 - 3:37

SLS produces strong, durable, and stable components with good dimensional accuracy,

3:37 - 3:43

suitable for functional prototypes, end-use parts, jigs, fixtures, and complex assemblies.

3:44 - 3:46

Thank you for watching!

3:46 - 3:51

To learn more about these two manufacturing processes, check out the CustomPartNet website.